Archive for April 27th, 2008

Hey Pig Pen. Yeah, you, the Mars Spirit Rover with the red Martian dust all over your solar panels. We’re filing a post on a bathtub later this day, so why don’t you take the hint and use one? What’s that? You’re millions of miles away and potable water may or might not be somewhere on the planet you’re currently exploring? Oh, well, in that case, pray for another wind storm or something, because these filthy before and after pics mean only about 1/3 of the Sun’s light is getting through to power your electronics. NASA’s plea for a sensor-cleaning interstellar dust storm is after the break.

Says NASA, via its Jet Propulsion Laboratory web page:

If Mars had an on-line Web site for ads, one of them might state something like this: “Wanted: Gentle space-age dust removal system to clean solar cells without leaving grit behind. Please direct inquiries to NASA.”

NASA’s Spirit rover has accumulated a lot of dust during four years of exploring Mars, especially following last year’s dust storms. Only about one-third of incoming sunlight is able to penetrate dust on the rover’s solar panels to be converted to electricity. As a result, Spirit is experiencing the lowest energy levels to date and accumulating a backlog of data waiting to be transmitted to Earth. The only available cleaning agent would be a timely gust of Martian wind!

On a more serious note, four years on planet (and one dodged budget cut) is an amazing accomplishment. [NASA via Tom’s Astronomy Blog]

Via [Gizmodo]

Comments No Comments »

GPS sales have been booming. Last January’s CES saw just about every manufacturer under the sun dumping out unit after unit, some with millions of points-of-interest and whatever else they have the ability to dream up to differentiate themselves in a crowded market. Alas, the party is over and everyone who wanted a GPS now has one, resulting […]

GPS sales have been booming. Last January’s CES saw just about each manufacturer under the sun dumping out unit after unit, some with millions of points-of-interest and whatever else they can dream up to differentiate themselves in a crowded market. Alas, the party is over and everyone who wanted a GPS now has one, resulting in a slowdown in sales.

GPS devices are like 20-inch rims — you purchase them once and pretty much ignore everything else out there until they break. Because they sit quietly in your vehicle and, unlike dubs, don’t spin wildly at 90 mph, they tend not to break. And, like a, road atlas, the routes rarely change so… you don’t buy new GPS devices. Unlike kicking stereos, you rarely upgrade.

So now we’re seeing GPS device prices falling and commidity players like Navman and Mio dumping units on the market at lower-than-low prices. Once every mother in Anytown, USA has a GPS, the big guys like Garmin and TomTom are going to lose market share and the kids are just going to pull up Google maps. The result? Get out of the GPS market as soon as you can.

Via [crunchgear]

Comments No Comments »

A demo of my NEW game. The graphics are actually super good, but they didn’t record well. Send me a message containing your email address if you want this demo.



Comments No Comments »

touchbb.jpgA New York Times story about the iPhone’s assault on Blackberry-maker RIM has a couple of interesting bits in it, notably that RIM CEO Mike Lazaridis isn’t a fan of touchscreens (”I couldn’t type on it and I still can’t type on it, and a lot of my friends can’t type on it”) but RIM’s hard at work on the long-rumored touchscreen Blackberry anyway, which RIM engineers have privately dubbed “the A.K.—for ‘Apple Killer.’”

Obviously fighting words, but they still make us more eager than ever to see their efforts on the touchscreen front—especially given how much RIM’s CEO dislikes touchscreen keyboards. Can they make a touchscreen phone that’ll satisfy hardcore Crackberry addicts weaned on a physical keyboard and swipe some of the iPhone’s cachet at the same time?

The other morsel is that one of their major strategies is to stick close to carriers, rather than the odd frenemy relationship Apple and Google have with them, even if it winds up killing RIM. Its other CEO, Jim Balsillie, states that “It might be a superior strategy to fight the carrier. We might be wrong. The carrier may get disintermediated, in which case we fade with them.” Guess he’s not of the “better to burn out” philosophy—though a hot new Blackberry wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world for RIM right now. [NYT]


Via [Gizmodo]

Comments No Comments »

Every once in a while you might see a automobile go by with a sticker proclaiming “Powered by soybeans” or “I run biodiesel! Ask me how!” or some such message. No doubt you’re curious, as I was. What are these mysterious frybrids, and do you want one? Your curiousity will be satisfied after the link. Biodeeez […]

Humma
Every once in a while you might see a automobile go by with a sticker proclaiming “Powered by soybeans” or “I run biodiesel! Ask me how!” or some such message. No doubt you’re curious, as I was. What are these mysterious frybrids, and do you want one? Your curiousity will be satisfied after the link.

Biodeeez nuts
Even though the popularity and visibility of alternative fuel sources has been increasing in the last decade or so, the idea of biodiesel is extremely old. In fact, old Rudolf Diesel himself ran one of his engines on peanut oil at the request of France (technically not biodiesel but you get the idea). The reason it never took off was simply that petroleum became a more feasible option and the infrastructure became built around that instead. Well, now greenhouse gas emissions, rising oil prices, and geopolitical politics have nudged the spotlight a bit toward biofuels again, and for some people it’s a great deal.


Essentially, it’s any kind of fatty oil that’s been purified and transesterased (a chemical substitution process), at which point it can be run in pretty much any diesel engine with little or no modification. One of the ideas of the diesel engine was fuel independence. Farmers could use their own corn oil in their diesel tractors, Siberians used their extra vodka, and so on. Nowadays, the petroleum industry has had so much infrastructure that it can be difficult to run a biodiesel automobile regularly. But that’s changing. People want to rely on foreign oil less and recycle what we have more. Thus the movement to use biofuels was reborn.

If you have a diesel engine, chances are all you have to do is find out where to get some biodiesel locally. This is easier than it sounds - there are services online for finding a place, and I imagine if you just ask your mechanic, he or she could point you in the right direction. Most likely you’ll be running a mix of petro-diesel and biodiesel. The label B__ describes the ratio: B20 is 20% biodiesel, B40 40% and so on. Price is difficult to predict, but considering how much gas costs these days, I doubt you’d be saving a lot of money by sticking with fossil fuels exclusively.

You can try to make your own, but I wouldn’t trust myself to do it and unless you’re a chemical engineer you shouldn’t either. It’s not as simple as driving to McDonalds, hijacking their fryer, and pouring it into your gas tank. There’s a chemical process involved (check it out) to make sure the stuff works right, to state nothing of all the fry bits that would end up in your fuel filters.


So what is biodiesel?
The Good
So other than feeling good about not contributing to the oil problem, what’s good about biodiesel? As it turns out, quite a lot:

  • Biodiesel has far lower harmful emissions than petroleum-based fuels
  • The fuel itself is nontoxic; a leak or tanker tipping over won’t injured a fly (unless it drowns)
  • It’s sustainable; there’s no biodiesel reservoir we’re emptying out
  • It runs cleaner, smoother, and quieter thanks to biodiesel being a natural lubricant

The Bad
Nice, right? Of course, there’s a flip side. Pure biodiesel has poor performance in cold weather; below freezing it becomes slushy. This usually isn’t a problem as the biodiesel will be cut with regular diesel and you can go safely down to -15F. Because biodiesel is a solvent, it will corrode rubber hosing and seals; ask your mechanic if you don’t know whether you’ve these. Most vehicles have synthetics instead of rubber and have for decades, but you never know. However, biodiesel’s solvent nature also means it will clear out a lot of the junk that’s been clogging your engine, so replace your filters after a tank or two.


The Nasty
One thing biodiesel proponents tend to gloss over is the fact that we’d need a huge amount of crops to fuel ourselves. Even as it is, half the world’s soy crop goes into fuel, and ethanol faces a similar problem. So we grow more, right? Wrong. Fuel crops are leaders in deforestation due to the massive amount needed, and it may be that the carbon footprint of destroying millions of acres of the Amazon (where soy is the biggest crop) far outweighs the benefits of reduced emissions. That’s a difficult question and one that’s by no means settled, so it’s worth considering.

Other sources for biodiesel are being researched, such as algae that produce it naturally, but these have nowhere near the capacity to fill demand at this time. Ideally there would be a clean and harmless way to produce the fuel as well as the fuel itself being relatively harmless, but that’s not the case. If it matters to you, you can find out where your biodiesel is coming from or start making your own from waste vegetable oil or some such.

It’s worth mentioning that there are also conversion kits available, like the “Frybrid,” which grant your car to run on pure vegetable oil that has been heated up to reduce viscosity. These are not biodiesel per se, but are close enough that you might think about one instead. The only trouble is acquiring enough vegetable oil to run it, but you probably get pretty good at that after a while.

Essentially, biodiesel is still a blended bag. It’s got its own set of pros and cons, but none of the benefits is a knockout punch when you consider the drawbacks. At this point its a matter of whether you want to do it, not whether you should.

Via [crunchgear]

Comments No Comments »

While we’ve heard Microsoft hint at keeping XP on store shelves longer than they initially said due to the, well, boatload of people who want nothing to do with Vista, Dell is the first retailer to confirm having plans to sell the faithful ol’ OS past the end of June. But it isn’t because Microsoft’s gone and changed their policy; it’s because Dell is taking advantage of a loophole in Vista licensing that lets Microsoft pad their Vista numbers even when people avoid it like the plague.

Dell will take advantage of a licensing option in Vista Business and Vista Ultimate that lets PC makers provide XP under the Vista license, which Microsoft calls a “downgrade” license. (Enterprises with site licenses have these same rights with any version of Vista.) In essence, the user is buying a Vista license that it can apply to XP, and Microsoft can still claim a Vista sale.

This is all well and good for people who want to purchase a new Computer with XP instead of Vista, but in what universe is Microsoft able to claim a Vista sale with this? That’s some shady accounting if I’ve ever seen it. That means if Dell sells way more machines with this “downgrade” option than with Vista, Microsoft can still claim that people are adopting Vista in droves.

But hey, it’ll keep XP available for people who want it, so I guess it’s a good thing no matter what kind of maneuvering it entails. But it just goes to show that you can never trust sales figures tossed out by marketing departments. [Personal computer World]


Via [Gizmodo]

Comments No Comments »

Close
E-mail It